Hold your breath

I don’t think there has ever been a moment quite like this in physics before. Within the next few months, weeks or even days we will learn something new about the universe that will change our thinking forever. I don’t mean something like a little CP asymmetry or a new observation of neutrino physics. These things are great but they just pose questions that we can’t answer yet. What we are about to learn is going to generate so many new ideas in physics that the arXiv will run out of four digit numbers so that people have to start posting their papers in viXra. Am I exaggerating, let’s see?

I am of course talking about the Higgs sector and what it will tell us about the way particles interact. Given the mass exclusions we already know from the Tevatron it is already more likely that the Higgs sector will be described by something outside the standard model. With the exception of two small mass ranges either side of the presently excluded region, a Higgs boson that is consistent with the standard model is not now possible. The answer is probably going to be something else, perhaps a Higgs multiplet from some form of supersymmetry, or perhaps no Higgs at all. Whatever it is, it will lead to a new standard model with new physics that we dont yet know, but we probably will by the end of this year. There is a fair chance it will lead to an understanding of what dark matter is, how inflation worked and perhaps a lot more. This is a great year to be a physicist.

The fun starts next week at the Europhsyics HEP conference (EPS2011). It may even begin sooner if CERN release all the results as conference notes before the start as they did for PLHC last month. Personally I’d rather it was announced at the conference. That would be more dramatic but if it becomes public before you can be sure we will report it here.

EPS 2011

So what will be shown at EPS2011, the main conference on particle physics this year? There is already a list of 370 talks online and 130 posters. All are interesting in their own way, but at least 60 of them are going to include new results from LHC and the Tevatron that could contain new physics about the Higgs sector. these are the ones everybody will be looking out for.

The interest starts on day one, the 21st July. ATLAS will present some SUSY search results which may or may not go beyond the results from PLHC last month. Then CFD and D0 will give us all the details of their Higgs channels using 8.5/fb or 8.9/fb for each one. This will be covered in five talks in the space of a couple of hours. At moriond the Tevatron already gave results using up to 8.2/fb but not for all channels so there could be some very useful information here about lower mass Higgs. They are not likely to see a signal but they could limit further or even exclude those last few places where a standard model Higgs can live.

On the second day we will see the Higgs search results from CMS and ATLAS, including all the individual channels and the combined results for each experiment. Some new searches for charged Higgs will also be included. This is the day when we are most likely to see the first signs of something spectacular, (if the beans have not already been spilt by then). That is because most of these results will be using about 1/fb of data, five times what was shown last month for a few searches and thirty times what has been used in most of them before. Even some of the posters have new results about SUSY on offer with 2011 data. I’m going to assume that 1/fb of data will be the norm for these results, but if it is less for some we will just have slightly longer to wait.

On the fifth day the Plenary sessions will start. There will be an “opening” address days after all the interesting talks have sunk in, just like at ICHEP last year when President Sarkozy turned up to give a speech. We don’t know who will appear this time. There will be a press conference but that will probably be just for the Main Stream Media and will not be broadcast. We don’t care because we will already have all the best information.

The plenary talks will be webcast live and will make fascinating viewing. The opening talk will be by Smoot on cosmology. There will be summaries of the results of the Higgs searches and outlooks from each continent. The plenary talks will be spread over three days.

Let’s now look in more detail at what the Higgs sector has to offer that could be so thrilling.

The Standard Model Higgs

What are the chances that the Higgs sector is described by a single standard model Higgs Boson? This is the least interesting result we could get because it would tell us nothing about Dark Matter or anything else beyond the standard model.

Most of the mass regions for a SM Higgs are already ruled out. From theory we know that a lone Higgs boson below 135 GeV would destabilise the vacuum. The Tevatron has excluded it in direct searches from 157 GeV to 172 GeV, and electroweak precision tests from LEP and the Tevatron rule out a standard model Higgs above 182 GeV. So there are just two small windows where it can still be hiding.

If it is not in these two mass regions then ATLAS will be able to show us a plot on the 22nd July that looks like this earlier simualtion

This will exclude the possibility that a lone standard model Higgs is the answer. In case they are unlucky with the statistics, CMS have the same reach and the Tevatron combined analysis will too. If the Higgs is in those windows then the combined projected significance for the LHC is 3 to 5 sigmas depending on the exact mass. By combining the signals we should have a very good indication of where it is by next week, unless the standard model is not everything to be found.


What if there is no Higgs signal to be found? Theories that propose this tend to use quite innovative ideas such as gravity induced symmetry breaking. Because these ideas are often quite outlandish it is right to say that a total exclusion of the Higgs would be the most revolutionary result the LHC could provide.

The combined 2/fb from ATLAS and CMS is sufficient to rule out the Higgs from about 120GeV to 535 GeV. Although a combined plot will not be presented at EPS-HEP, the individual results will be. These can be crudely combined by comparing bumps to see if the combined plot is likely to produce anything of significance. The Tevatron will also add information especially for the remaining window between 114 GeV and 120 GeV. So if the Higgs sector is Higgless up to 500 GeV we are going to have a good indication of that too next week. A much heavier Higgs might be possible but it would have to be accompanied by other heavy particles to account for the electroweak precision tests. Chances are there would be some other clue in the data about what is going on, and it might be revealed next week.

Heavy Higgs

Precision tests suggest that the Higgs cannot be heavy, but these tests assume there is no other physics. If we rule out the standard model they don’t apply anymore and a Higgs boson above 182 GeV is perfectly possible. Using this plot of projected signifcance we can get an idea of what might be coming.

If there is a Higgs boson in the range 200 GeV to 500 Gev it should produce a signal with between 2 and 3 sigma signifcance from 1/fb. A signal of that size would be inconclusive, but if the same signal appears for both ATLAS and CMS it would be a different story. Here is a rough indication of what kind of shape we might expect to see if there is a heavy Higgs at around 200GeV

I have not included the expected significance but the peak at 200 GeV would have to be around 2 to 3 sigmas. An enlarged exclusion around the existing tevatron exclusion is to be expected and a new exclusion higher up is possible. This makes the signal an isolated peak, but the signal itself should be not more than about 20 GeV wide.

Finding a heavy Higgs signal would be a dramatic new result because there would have to be something else with it to account for precision tests. That might show up too, either as another peak on the same plot or in other searches.

Light Higgs and Multiplets

A light Higgs is harder to locate for CMS and ATLAS but if they present their full digamma results as 1/fb and the Tevatron present their results at 8.5/fb, then the combined signal could be promising. A light Higgs is the signature of SUSY and is usually acompanied by other bosons. The MSSM has a multiplet of five Higgs some of which are charged. The next model has seven  of them. These extra bosons are likely to be in a range that could be seen as another heavy Higgs or in charged Higgs searches that are also being presented. A light Higgs on its own destabilises the vacuum so it is hard to see how it could not be accompanied by something else.

Whatever way you look at it the chances are we will have something positive to look at for EPS, and if we don’t there will be more data for the next conference with between 5/fb and 10/fb by the end of this year for each of ATLAS and CMS. Whatever is found will tell us in quantitative detail about how the Higgs sector works and it will inspire many new lines of theoretical search to be tested in the years that follow.

I know that some people think the collaborations need to be still more open and fast with their data, but it is unprecedented for such large collaborations in particle physics to show so many results so soon after the data has been collected. It is really an impressive achievement if they do.

16 Responses to Hold your breath

  1. Leo Vuyk says:

    For an alternative particle model I would suggest the next vixra:

    It is an interesting challenge to postulate that the FORM and structure of elementary particles is the origin of different FUNCTIONS of these particles.
    Secondly, that all particles are siblings of the mother of all particles the Higgs particle which is supposed to be able to transform by collision.
    If we define mass as the ability of Fermions to change some of the scattered Higgs particles into as much Gravitons, then we may interpret also the “Eigenenergy” of Fermions as the Higgs changing process into different kinds of Photons, without the need for a MASSIVE HIGGS PARTICLE. SO the Higgs could be massless and the same as what is called dark energy.

    Leo Vuyk.

  2. Tony Smith says:

    Here are the conference talks that I find most fascinating:

    21 July at 09:30 – Wjj by Viviana Cavaliere

    21 July at 15:30 – Higgs Searches by Ben Gripaios

    By the end of the day Thursday 21 July we might have a pretty good idea about answers to the questions:

    Is the Wjj bump real (I would like it to correspond to a Tquark state in the 120-160 GeV range) ?
    What is the overall structure of the Higgs system (I would like it to be a 3-state system similar to the 3 peaks in the CMS preliminary plot with central peak around 200 GeV) ?

    Many details about Higgs will come the next day:

    22 July at 12:15 – Higgs to ZZ and 4l (the golden channel) by Antonio Baroncelli (ATLAS)

    22 July at 12:35 – Higgs to ZZ and 4l (the golden channel) by Chiara Mariotti (CMS)

    22 July at 14:30 – Higgs to WW by Antonio Baroncelli (ATLAS)

    22 July at 14:45 – Higgs to WW by Dmytro Kovalskyi (CMS)

    22 July at 15:00 – Combined SM Higgs search by Antonio Baroncelli (ATLAS)

    22 July at 15:20 – Combined SM Higgs search by Manfred Krammer (CMS)

    The conference has many other wonderful talks on schedule and I do not mean any disrespect to them,
    but to me the above are the most interesting.

    The highlights talks and press conference on the following Monday (25 July) seem to me to be somewhat of an anticlimax,
    but they may lead to fairly accurate new reports in outlets such as the Tuesday New York Times Science Section.


    • Philip Gibbs says:

      There are two Wjj talks on the 21st, 930 by CDF and 945 by D0. Will they have changed their claims or will it just be a quick summary of the previous talks?

  3. […] Some of you might think this is just ridiculous hype, but I couldn’t possibly comment… I don’t think there has ever been a moment quite like this in physics before. Within the next few months, weeks or even days we will learn something new about the universe that will change our thinking forever. I don’t mean something like a little CP asymmetry or a new observation of neutrino physics. These things are great but they just pose questions that we can’t answer yet. What we are about to learn is going to generate so many new ideas in … Read More […]

  4. Tony Smith says:

    As to whether “… there has ever been a moment quite like this in physics before …”
    the only one that comes close that I can think of is the one described by Peter Coles in astro-ph/0102462 saying:
    “… The modern era of cosmology began with the publication of
    Einstein’s general theory of relativity in 1915.
    The first experimental test of this theory was Eddington’s famous expedition to measure the bending of light at a total solar eclipse in 1919. …”.

    In 1919 that experiment indicated the validity of General Relativity. Subsequent eclipses with better statistics, such as 1922 Australia, confirmed that indication of validity.

    Now, 92 years later, the LHC results might do for the Standard Model (perhaps modified a bit) what the 1919 eclipse did for General Relativity,
    which would show the importance of future LHC operations to get more nearly conclusive results with better statistics,
    also to explore the high energy realm where electroweak symmetry is unbroken.

    In 1919 the Sun and Moon and Eclipses were the only things that could test General Relavity.

    Now, the LHC is the only thing that can similarly test the Standard Model (perhaps modified a bit).


  5. Marc Sher says:

    Phil—A 135 GeV Higgs does not destabilize the vacuum of the Standard Model, even up to the GUT/Planck scale. The limit is closer to 125 GeV (see a 2007 summary by Espinosa et al). Of course, even at 115, the instability sets in at 1 PeV, and we all believe the Standard Model will break down before then.

    • Philip Gibbs says:

      Marc, thanks for those details. I suppose a Higgs in that range without much else to show is a possibility then.

      • JollyJoker says:


        Tommaso Dorigo discussing a 2009 paper by Espinosa on the same subject.

      • Marc Sher says:

        Hmm. That 2009 paper gives slightly higher numbers (for the Planck scale cutoff, the actual number they give is 128.6 for a top mass of 173.1 GeV—see their equation 4). The 2007 paper used somewhat lower top masses, and every GeV in m_top changes the bound by 2 GeV…so for a top of 171, the bound is 124.6. The theory uncertainties are actually quite small, and the result only depends on alpha_QCD and m_top.

      • JollyJoker says:

        Latest CDF claims i could find on the top mass were 172,70 +- 1,09 GeV, so if I understand correctly a top of 171,6 – 173,8 gives 125,6 – 130 for a “fully consistent” Higgs.

        I assume the lower number would be the one to use, so your original “The limit is closer to 125 GeV” seems pretty accurate.

  6. Lawrence B. Crowell says:

    A Higgs-less world would be surprising. A lot of theory gets shredded as well. There would have to be alternatives. A gravity induced symmetry breaking would be interesting, and at times I have pondered whether the Higgs field is some sort of scalar boson from gravity or quantum gravity.

  7. 1. Gravity cannot be explained without explaining how mass originated.

    2. As I said before, negativity is interference of particles/strings/waves which formulates the basis for matter/antimatter limited states. Because observations are infinite due uncertainty, entanglement has to be finite. Therefore there is neither particle that can be explained solely by particle, no wave that can be explained by wave, nor string that can be explained by string.
    3. General relativity space/time is transcendent matter/time VS space/energy in quantum mechanics.
    4. You cannot detect Higgs because so called Higgs may be part of something else that you exclude of.
    5. Don’t try to be a geneticist that hunts for perfect gene – hunt for perfect system/model that predicts time.
    6. Colliding clocks that run out of phase will give confusing results.
    7. It is not impossible for a scalar to be an actual vector. But it is impossible for a vector to be a pure scalar.

  8. Observer says:

    Maybe someone should ask George Smoot about the issues raised about the WMAP CMB power spectrum results in arXiv:1107.2654!

  9. Ulla says:


    Can you explain a bit:
    Therefore there is neither particle that can be explained solely by particle, no wave that can be explained by wave, nor string that can be explained by string.

  10. […] few days ago I said you should hold your breath for some exciting Higgs results over the next few days, weeks or months. There was some skepticism […]

%d bloggers like this: