Searching for Earth’s Twin

This has been a great year for experimental big science with ground-breaking findings in particle physics and astronomy. One of the most remarkable breakthroughs has been the success in the search for planets around other stars. The word exoplanet which first appeared in print in 1995 according to google, and has become a popular term in news reports in just the last three, has become ever more familiar this year as reports from the Kepler space telescope have taken the number of candidate exoplanets into the thousands.

Kepler is constantly watching 145,000 main sequence stars in our nearby region of the Milky Way galaxy in the direction of the constellations Lyra and Cygnus. It is looking for the tiny dimming of light that tells us that a planet has passed in front of the stars disk. By recording the amount of dimming,  how long it lasts for and how frequently it repeats, Kepler can estimate the size and orbit of the planet. In February NASA released a catalog of 1236 candidate exoplanets and this month the number increased to 2326. These have to be verified by ground based observation and so far the catalog of confirmed exoplanets has 716 entries.

The real interest about exoplanets concerns whether or not there is other life in the universe, and if there is, how common it is. A whole new industry of exoplanetary statistics has been born with scientists inventing habitability indexes that can be applied to the exoplanet catalogs to gauge which ones could support life. One habitable planet catalog has two exoplanets regarded as more Earth-like than Mars. These are HD 85512b and Gleise 581d, both found earlier this year, but they are rather large to be comfortable for us to live on. If they have an atmosphere it is could be too thick due to the stronger gravity. Already Venus has a thick atmosphere making the pressure too hot and high pressure for us to survive. If we discovered an exoplanet like Venus we would be very excited because it is in the habitable zone and is very similar to Earth in size. Finding out about its atmosphere would be difficult from a distance of many light-years.

This week some new “Earth-twins” were announced Kepler 20f and Kepler 20e. They are very similar in size to earth but they are not in their Suns habitable zone where the temperature would be about right for liquid water and conditions similar to Earth. It is good news that Kepler has proven that it can find planets of this size but we will need to wait before we find ones where we could really live. It is said that these planets may have been further from their star in the past so that life could have formed there in the past. This just serves to emphasize one more characteristic an exoplanet must have if it is likely to support life as we know it on Earth. It must stay in a stable orbit around a stable star for billions of years so that life can evolve without being obliterated by heat or freezing.

Kepler has a planned lifespan of 3.5 years and may have its life extended. This should give it time to find some more earth-like planets orbiting Sun-like stars with periods of about 1 year. Kepler takes time to find these because they need to pass in front of their star at least twice to confirm their existence and orbit. because Kepler works by looking at such transit events it only sees planetary systems whose disk is aligned with Earth. If it were looking at earth from afar it would have only a one in 700 chance that this alignment occurred. If Kepler finds  one Earth-like planet we could guess that there are 700 in the sample they are looking at, which represents 1 millionth of the stars in our galaxy, but will it really find any?

My guess at this stage is that it will find a number of Earth-sized planets and a number of small planets in the habitable zone, but the statistics may be against it finding an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a stable star like ours. Probably we will be able to estimate how many such planets there are and it may be something like a million in our galaxy. It could be a lot less. The next step will be tp determine how many are likely to have the right chemical mixture to form water and an Earth-like atmosphere. We don’t yet know the answer, but it is exciting that the data we need to answer these questions is starting to become available.

12 Responses to Searching for Earth’s Twin

  1. Paul Hoiland says:

    Exciting times. But even if we find evidence of such it is still a long way off from us being able to actually go there to see if life exists.

  2. Mike says:

    If the FTL neutrino results are correct, maybe we can get to these exoplanets a little faster than previously expected 😉

  3. Anonymous says:

    “Kepler takes time to find these because they need to pass in front of their star at least twice to confirm their existence and orbit.”

    It is actually three times they have to observe the pass.

  4. Paul Hoiland says:

    And about ten years of getting all the economies out of the trash heap then 200 years of tech development and maybe we’d be ready. But then if one considers the history of past research efforts in that area like BPP I even doub’t then we could get there. Someone would find some political reason to cancel the program as usual.

  5. Paul Hoiland says:

    There is also the problem that while the CERN case may show it is possible for a non-charged low mass particle one needs to remember the rest of the neutrinos, electrons, etc all seem limited to C. Whilke the media hypes up things like this case and at one time warp drive even if we found proof tomorrow we could go faster than light you still have to convince either the political system or a privite group to spend the dime for research, not to mention find a crew for a long mission.

  6. Paul Hoiland says:

    Right now none of the worlds found so far actually is a planet that any human’s could survive on. Sure, having grown up on SF like Startrek I’d love to see us be able to do something like that. But reality of life tells me we are a long way from point A now to ever reaching point B. If we ever do reach out it will depend upon a lot of more small steps for mankind like those taken on the Moon in our own local neighborhood around Sol. And right now politics and economy issues have taken more of a liking to machines doing all the small steps.

  7. Lawrence B. Crowell says:

    A number of these planets are in close orbits around dwarf M-class stars. This likely means they are tidally locked with the star. I think this may reduce their likelihood of being biologically active. The planet would be extremely hot at the star facing side and the antipodal side cryogenic. A thick atmosphere could easily make them similar to Venus.


    • Philip Gibbs says:

      Yes we really want planets in the habitable zone of a Star like our Sun. This means they must have an orbit period of about a year so we will not start to know about them until between two and three years of data have been collected. Kepler started observing in May 2009 so it is just beginning to reach that point. In another year we will start to get a better idea of whether Kepler will see something more truly Earthlike.

      • Lawrence B. Crowell says:

        One difficulty is there is an observation bias for planets close to the star. The orbits are more frequent and more easily detected by transit or Doppler methods.


      • Philip Gibbs says:

        That’s right, but in time it should be possible to do a detailed analysis of the Fermi data and get very good estimates for the frequency of planets of different types around different stars, down to the limit of the sensitivity of the instruments.

        I hope the success of the mission will encourage another one to be planned with more sensitive instruments and the capacity to scan more stars in the hope that we can find more habitable exoplanets

  8. Mike says:

    Smaller, cooler stars should be possible – the planet would need to be closer to get into a habitable zone but that works out better for us as it will have shorter period and more easily detectable. I guess most stars on the HR diagram won’t fall into this category so unless we are lucky, it will take a little time to find the right ones.

  9. Tim Johnson says:

    Venus is too readily dismissed as a possible home of life. The upper atmosphere has a band where the atmospheric pressure and temperature is about the same as on Earth. It’s not hard to imagine at least microbial life floating quite comfortably at that level. Weighing the likelihood of success against the difficulty of the search I think Venus should get more attention than it has had so far.

%d bloggers like this: